taking away managers where they are neededNot enough staff in some areas and far too many managers in others - so many that they just sit around on >$100,000/yr causing trouble, don't help the network move a single extra passenger or gram of freight and with pay packets like that they are not helping efficiency either, but their job descriptions make them look pretty important. It really looks like the redundancies either didn't go far enough or targeted the wrong people.
Edited 06 Jul 2013 12:30, 8 years ago, edited by HeadShunt
taking away managers where they are neededNot enough in some areas and far too many in others - so many that they just sit around on >$100,000/yr causing trouble, don't help the network move a single extra passenger or gram of freight and with pay packets like that they are not helping efficiency either, but their job descriptions make them look pretty important. It really looks like the redundancies either didn't go far enough or targeted the wrong people.
Edited 06 Jul 2013 12:19, 8 years ago, edited by HeadShunt
taking away managers where they are neededNot enough in some areas and far too many in others - so many that they just sit around on >$100,000/yr causing trouble, don't help the network move a single extra passenger or gram of freight and with pay packets like that they are not helping efficiency either, but their job descriptions make them look pretty important.
Edited 06 Jul 2013 12:17, 8 years ago, edited by HeadShunt
taking away managers where they are neededNot enough in some areas and far too many in others - so many that they just sit around causing trouble, but their job descriptions make them look pretty important.
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.
Stats for nerds
Gen time: 0.5408s | RAM: 6.99kb