Labour did specify the time period. 2028. 10 year project FFSShe didn't specify the time period for the building project.Her promise was enormous, and her total failure to deliver that promise (about 0.3% of the total promised houses were actually built) constitutes a big, fat lie in my book. She lied to the most vulnerable people in New Zealand society about what she was going to do.She lied to New Zealand is the bottom line - she didn't even deliver one percent of the promised homes. And they rewarded her by returning her to office with an increased majority.
Can you name one politician of any flavour worldwide who has delivered on 100% of their promises? For that matter any human? It simply isn't possible, unless you make 0 promises...But it's okay because she's somehow like-able and people like Michael want to let her off for that reason.
Strategically done to be a promise that one could drive truck through and not 'technically' break. Shameless really, like most politicians.
And yet to some, not delivering 100,000 in the first year 2019 is somehow a lie.
It was based upon private ownership for low income households.
Dubious, but reliant upon private property developers, so not a snowflakes chance.
Back to the drawing board, which the electorate actually understood: yet they still voted for Labour.
Edited 20 Oct 2020 14:24, 2 months ago, edited by justarider
Labour did specify the time period. 2028. 10 year project FFSShe didn't specify the time period for the building project.Her promise was enormous, and her total failure to deliver that promise (about 0.3% of the total promised houses were actually built) constitutes a big, fat lie in my book. She lied to the most vulnerable people in New Zealand society about what she was going to do.She lied to New Zealand is the bottom line - she didn't even deliver one percent of the promised homes. And they rewarded her by returning her to office with an increased majority.
Can you name one politician of any flavour worldwide who has delivered on 100% of their promises? For that matter any human? It simply isn't possible, unless you make 0 promises...But it's okay because she's somehow like-able and people like Michael want to let her off for that reason.
Strategically done to be a promise that one could drive truck through and not 'technically' break. Shameless really, like most politicians.
And yet to some, not delivering 100,000 in the first year 2019 is somehow a lie.
It was based upon private ownership for low income households.
Duboius, but reliant upon private property developers, so not a snowflakes chance.
Back to the drawing board, which the electorate actually understood: yet they still voted for Labour.
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.
Stats for nerds
Gen time: 0.3981s | RAM: 5.72kb