Station naming deals announced
Runaway Rail Car Kicked Loose by Teen Hits New York Station
Škoda unveils its second tram for the Chinese market
Wabtec to buy Faiveley Transport for US$1·8bn
Constantine tram extension contract
Channel Tunnel: '2,000 migrants' tried to enter
Ottawa urban rail gets federal funding
UK and Italian operators order Vossloh locomotives
First Great Western and Eversholt sign Hitachi AT300 train contract
Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi invite interest in DIKKM railway
UK: The Competition & Markets Authority has published a consultation document seeking feedback on the desirability and feasibility of four options for significantly increasing on-rail competition between passenger train operators.
The aim would be to produce competition ‘in the market’, which the CMA suggests could be more effective at generating benefits than the current competition ‘for the market’ when largely self-contained franchises are awarded.
The four options are:
The CMA considers that these options would be most likely to deliver benefits on the East Coast, West Coast and Great Western main lines. They would not be implemented until 2023 at the earliest, to protect the rights of current franchisees and ongoing or imminent tendering processes. The Midland Main Line could also be considered, if this could be separated from the wider East Midlands franchise. Commuter services are not being considered, because of the ‘additional challenges’ of capacity constraints and the desire of passengers to travel on the first available train.
Following discussions with stakeholders and consideration of evidence from the UK and abroad, the CMA has concluded that ‘the evidence suggests that a material increase in on-rail competition would result in benefits for passengers and taxpayers’, though ‘downward pressure on fares, greater incentives to enhance service quality and to innovate, operational efficiencies at the train operator level, more effective use of network capacity’ and ‘cost savings in network operation’.
Funding for investment and the operation of socially desirable services would come from new market entrants making a greater contribution to the costs of the network, such as through fixed track access charges (which open access operators do not currently pay) and a ‘universal service levy’.
This article first appeared on www.railwaygazette.com
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2020 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.