Pacific National has begun scrapping railway assets in NSW says the Rail Revival Alliance
Newcastle Rail Judgement In July says the Rail Revivial Alliance
Newcastle rail line necessary for progress
A special levy on land values would fund the Melbourne Metro Rail
MP Geoff Lee: Parramatta needs multiple, shorter light rail lines
Brisbane Valley rail trail group reboots funding campaign
Toll motorists to pay for rail tunnel, expert says
McCloy lays property interests on the table
The east-west link is dead - a victory for 21st-century thinking
Here's what a real infrastructure plan looks like - Everald Compton
Simon Jenkins (Opinion, 21 July) still doesn’t understand what HS2 is about. It was perhaps foolish to call the project “High Speed 2”, so that many people think it’s about getting from London to points north more quickly. But its main raison d’être is increasing the capacity of the railways. When in the 1960s we ran out of capacity on the roads and built the M1 and M6, people didn’t see the reason for these as being able to get somewhere by car more quickly: it was understood that the roads were full. True, as with HS2, people didn’t want the new roads next to their houses. I travel to London fairly regularly on the west coast mainline (WCML). Unlike most passengers, I usually spend most of the journey looking out of the window rather than working or reading. South of Rugby it’s quite obvious that the line is very busy indeed, and I understand from the railway technical press that during the day there’s very little spare capacity (extra train paths) available for freight trains, for which there is a demand. Car drivers are aware when roads are full; but unless the train is late most rail passengers have no idea about the capacity of the line they’re travelling on.
The stories you need to read, in one handy email
Alternatives to HS2 have been considered – reopening the Great Central Line, for instance, but there was a fuss about that as well – but it was concluded that the best value for money was to build a new high speed railway, which would also be a high capacity railway, so that existing fast passenger trains could be diverted on to it, creating more capacity for freight and commuter trains on the existing WCML. Do we wish to see ever increasing numbers of HGVs on our roads, or do we have an interest in moving goods around in a more environmentally efficient way?
This article first appeared on www.theguardian.com
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2020 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.