KAP drafting legislation to try to alter Inland Rail route
Rose City voice to join rail project
CP Rail investigating after train derails between Golden and Revelstoke
Inland rail builders promise community consultation
Price tag for $10b Melbourne to Brisbane rail project could be higher
Moree Plains Shire Council receives $300,000 in funding for freight and infrastructure funding
New business park part of Moree's plan for big rail role
Inland rail delayed by Canberra's indecision
Albury-Wodonga stop confirmed for inland rail project
Need to solve inland rail's 'missing link' says Port of Brisbane
A CAMPAIGN to stop coal trains running on a proposed inland freight line has been ramped up, after the federal government was attacked for withholding information.
The government’s Australian Rail Track Corporation was in the firing line when Logan City councillors Laurie Smith and Trevina Schwarz took up the plight of residents living along the proposed Kagaru to Acacia Ridge section of the Inland Rail line.
The councillors launched their missive, explaining the ills of coal dust, days before the first Inland Rail community consultative committee meeting for the year on Monday, February 11.
A loaded coal train passes through the outskirts of Singleton, in the NSW Hunter Valley.“This seems to be flying under the radar and the federal government is certainly not raising the coal issue,” Cr Schwarz said.
“They are not attending to the residents, they are not letting them know details, they are not raising the alarms.
“I know they don’t want to do that because they just want to put the line through.
“We were basically told that it was not going to be consultation and engagement and basically, we are going to be told when they start building it.”
Cr Schwarz said residents wanted a passenger line and could live with a busy freight line but were opposed to coal trains.
Residents along the Inland Rail track are concerned about toxic coal dust and property values falling.Cr Smith said households using tank water would also suffer and residents living along the line faced a life breathing in toxic coal dust while watching their property values slump, if the plans went ahead without an environmental impact assessment.
Currently there are 30 to 40 trains a week on the line.
But, Cr Smith said, that would jackpot to 45-64 trains a day by 2040, which equated to one every 32 minutes.
“And we’re not talking about a normal goods trains, these are 1.8km in length and by 2040 could even be 3.6km in length — that’s a lot of dust.”
An ARTC spokesman said containing dust was up to the train operators and the state government could refuse permits to those who failed.
The spokesman denied claims the ARTC was foiling plans for an environmental impact Statement and said a commitment was made in November for the project to be lodged with the Coordinator General’s department by the end of February.
“There will be a range of detailed investigations undertaken to understand the characteristics of the existing environment, consider and describe the potential impacts of the project and detail how any impacts may be mitigated,” the spokesman said.
“These investigations generally include geotechnical, flooding and hydrology, ecological, noise, air quality and vibration, social and heritage studies.
“The use of the Coordinated Project assessment is robust, independently managed by the Office of the Coordinator-General, and enables community and whole of government input on the assessment of a proposed project.”
This article first appeared on www.couriermail.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2020 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.