Public Transport Victoria forum hears call for more Maryborough train services
State Government Commits to Developing Rail Infrastructure for Victoria
Horsham residents to be quizzed about future use of dormant rail corridor land
No choppers here: Malcolm Turnbull takes the train to Geelong
Opposition Leader Matthew Guy backs Melbourne Airport rail link
Jail time for train threats to Vline Staff
Premier Daniel Andrews hears efforts to address Central Goldfields disadvantage, push for more Maryborough trains
The Inland Rail Link Melbourne to Brisbane a Similar Case as the RAA's Bendigo - Geelong Rail Link
North-West Rail Alliance urges more council support amid push for return of Mildura passenger rail
Grampians Rail Trail: Shire calls for community to step up and manage facility
Tens of billions of dollars is set to be spent on extravagant new infrastructure projects across Australia that haven’t been properly assessed to see if they stack up financially or if they’re even needed at all.
This runs the very real risk of taxpayers’ money being chucked at “outrageous” and expensive road and rail projects that provide no return on investment.
During the election campaign, the Coalition committed $5 billion to a rail link to Melbourne’s Tullamarine Airport and kicked $2 billion into a pot to build a higher speed rail line to Geelong — yet neither is considered a “high priority” on a road and rail wish list produced by the Government’s own infrastructure scrutiny body.
A $1 billion road upgrade in Queensland is so low priority it doesn’t even make it onto the list, while a $1.6 billion promise to extend the M1 motorway in New South Wales is rated as no more important than an “active walking strategy” for Sydney’s CBD.
An infrastructure expert says governments shouldn’t commit to huge infrastructure projects until they know they are actually worth building.
A rail link to Melbourne Airport will be built at a cost of around $10 billion. But it’s not ranked as a ‘high priority’ project.Source:Supplied
Speaking on Wednesday at the AFR National Infrastructure Summit in Melbourne, federal Infrastructure Minister Alan Tudge said the Morrison Government had a 10-year $100 billion infrastructure pipeline.
“The bulk of the funding is on the large city-shaping road and rail projects along with key national roads of strategic importance,” he told the audience.
“(Our objective) is to improve the lives of all Australians, take pressure off our major cities while supporting growth in our regions and getting people home sooner and safer.”
But speaking to news.com.au on the sidelines of the summit, one of Australia’s leading thinkers on large-scale infrastructure said many of the announced projects hadn’t yet proved themselves worthy of having billions lavished on them.
“I’m always concerned about projects that are announced by a politician when they don’t have a business case, and that’s because we don’t even know if it’s going to have a terrible benefit-to-cost ratio. No one does,” said Marion Terrill, transport and cities program director at think tank the Grattan Institute.
“The only way we know is if we do a proper assessment.”
This article first appeared on www.news.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2020 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.