KAP drafting legislation to try to alter Inland Rail route
Rose City voice to join rail project
CP Rail investigating after train derails between Golden and Revelstoke
Inland rail builders promise community consultation
Price tag for $10b Melbourne to Brisbane rail project could be higher
Moree Plains Shire Council receives $300,000 in funding for freight and infrastructure funding
New business park part of Moree's plan for big rail role
Inland rail delayed by Canberra's indecision
Albury-Wodonga stop confirmed for inland rail project
Need to solve inland rail's 'missing link' says Port of Brisbane
DEPUTY Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce did not declare during Cabinet discussions on the Inland Rail that he had bought five large parcels of land within a 15-minute drive from the planned route.
When former Infrastructure Minister Darren Chester took the Inland Rail project to Cabinet, The Daily Telegraph understands it passed quickly, with no mention from Mr Joyce of any potential conflict of interest relating to five lots of land he had bought within about 20km of the project.
The current Nationals leader’s office said that he was not required to make any declaration.
Mr Joyce purchased the first two blocks of rural land, on two separate land titles, in Warrumbungle Shire, north of Coonamble, in July 2006 for $230,000.
A map showing Joyce's property in relation to the proposed rail lineHe added to his land purchase two years later with an adjacent Gwabegar property and a second Warrumbungle property, occupying another two land titles, in February 2008 for $342,571.
The Cabinet handbook’s section on Declarations of Private Interests states: “Ministers and officials attending Cabinet or Cabinet committee meetings must declare any private interests of which they are aware.”
Mr Joyce’s spokeswoman indicated that he did not need to declare the land to Cabinet during discussions on the Inland Rail route.
“There has never been a proposal to have a stop near Warrumbungle or Gwabegar,” she said. “Mr Joyce has had no role in selecting the route.”
Opposition Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development spokesman Anthony Albanese said this appeared to be yet another breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct by Mr Joyce.
“Given that Barnaby Joyce has spoken about the benefits of Inland Rail for those on the land along the route, it is reasonable to expect he would be mindful of declaring any direct interest he might have,” he said.
The Daily Telegraph understands Mr Chester took the proposal to Cabinet and it was adopted swiftly. The only area of debate was the route’s alignment near Toowoomba in Queensland.
The value of the rural land properties near the Inland Rail route would be expected to increase when the project is complete.
At the time he purchased the first two lots of land in 2006, Mr Joyce was a Queensland senator in the Howard government.
Joyce’s office said that he was not required to make any declaration on the land in question. Picture: Gary RamageDuring 2006 work was done by then transport and regional services minister Warren Truss on proposed routes for a potential inland rail project.
The North-South Rail Corridor Study, made public in September 2006, included Coonamble as a stop on a proposed route.
The proposed rail route is about 20km west of Mr Joyce’s properties.
This article first appeared on www.dailytelegraph.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2018 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.