Partial privatisation studies included in DB restructuring
The Next Federal Election and Passenger and Freight Rail
Transport and Logistics symposium to gauge railway link
Rail gets another CRC. Third time lucky?
Chinese high speed rail should confine the XPT to history
Hendy heads to NR
Urban rail news in brief - July 2015
Inland rail a trifecta for Toowoomba region: mayor
In 1891, at the end of Melbourne’s first property boom, the nation’s original capital was the largest city in Australia with almost half a million inhabitants.
It constituted 42 per cent of Victoria’s population and, as Geoffrey Blainey observed, “some economists thought that such a centralising of the people in a capital city was quite without precedent and utterly unhealthy”.
Fast forward 126 years and that “unhealthy” trend has become much worse as 77 per cent of Victoria’s population are now in Melbourne. The vastness of Melbourne is something to behold and the centralising of Victoria’s population continues as 92 per cent of new arrivals to Victoria stay in the capital.
Victoria is growing by one person every five minutes, more than 100,000 a year, and is the fastest growing state in the nation, with net overseas migration accounting for about 60 per cent of this expansion.
We have seldom seen population growth like it. The Gold Rush of the 1850s saw a sevenfold increase in Victoria’s population, so by the end of that decade almost half of the Australian continent’s population was living in Victoria. Indeed, British historian Tristram Hunt remarked in his wonderful book Ten Cities That Made an Empire that, despite Sydney being the birthplace of British sovereignty in Australia in 1788, “100 years on, it was the city of Melbourne, not Sydney, that was chosen to commemorate the anniversary”.
After World War II, the post-war migration boom saw rapid population growth, particularly from southern Europe. But Victoria’s present growth dwarfs the population booms of the 1850s and 1960s, and is contributing towards an infrastructure crisis characterised by severe road congestion, overcrowded public transport, schools bursting at the seams and a scarcity in the residential house market that is taking home ownership out of reach of many young Melburnians.
To this lamentable list might be added the weakening of the city’s social cohesion, as evidenced by the crime epidemic caused by Premier Daniel Andrews’s per-capita cut in police numbers.
Melbourne is nowhere near as liveable as it was. On present projections, our once beautiful city will have doubled in size by 2051, to eight million people, to become the largest city in Australia once again. This is a worrying prospect when considering just how unprepared the state is for this intensity of growth.
Growth is good but not when it is unplanned, and the present state government is more interested in allowing citizens to self-select their own gender on their birth certificate than planning for this massive growth in population.
This is the Premier who spent $1.2 billion of taxpayers’ money to rip up the contracts for the East West Link road project, ignoring the fact a disproportionate number of Melburnians drive to work — 107,792 more than in Sydney, even though Sydney has 400,000 more people.
Opposition Leader Matthew Guy’s vision is to decentralise Victoria and develop its regional cities, to take the pressure off Melbourne and grow country Victoria.
The state desperately needs a government that is committed to decreasing the percentage of newcomers who make their home in Melbourne. Our state needs a government that will engage in a mature debate about how to incentivise newcomers to move to country Victoria, or give them the confidence that if they move to a regional centre they can commute to Melbourne with reliability and ease.
Victoria is slightly larger than the island of Great Britain in landmass, yet almost 800,000 people commute to London from the rest of England and Wales, mainly by train. We want to see more people commuting to Melbourne from regional Victoria — we can’t have a Melbourne that expands forever.
We want the great legacies of our Gold Rush — the regional centres of Ballarat and Bendigo, Sir John Monash’s great triumph of the Latrobe Valley, Shepparton and Victoria’s second city of Geelong, indeed the whole of regional Victoria, to become beneficiaries of this population growth.
On only three occasions during the past century has the rate of population growth been higher in the regions than in Melbourne. The first was during the Great Depression of the late 1920s and early 1930s, when many people quit Melbourne in search of jobs; immediately after World War II; and from 1976 to 1985, thanks to the decentralisation policies of the Liberal government of Rupert Hamer.
Victoria’s population, the speed of its growth and its geographical distribution is a great example of an issue that has for too long been ignored.
All the political lessons from last year, from the US and Britain, indicate that if hardworking families away from capital cities and the governing elite believe they are missing out on the growth others take for granted, the results at the ballot box can be surprising.
Labor concerns itself with cultural relativism and niche issues of identity politics — but mainstream Australians in regional centres and outer suburbs could not care less about issues that preoccupy the chattering classes. They want better road and rail infrastructure so they can get home from work faster and spend more time with their families.
An effective decentralisation agenda is key to improving capital city liveability and the economic wellbeing of the regions.
This article first appeared on www.theaustralian.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2017 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.