Lund – Malmö quadruple tracking contract
Prime Minister inaugurates Napoli Afragola station
ÖBB starts Pyhrnstrecke station upgrading
Weekly LCL service widens appeal of China-Europe rail route
Siemens to buy planning software company HaCon
Hupac orders eight multisystem locomotives
Montecargo privatisation cancelled
IONX and Ermewa agree telematics partnership
High-value chemicals travel from China to Europe by rail
DB Regio selected for Rhein-Neckar operating contract
An ambitious project to build the longest undersea rail tunnel in the world between Helsinki and Tallinn is being held up by the Estonian government over worries about the plan and where the money is coming from. It should let the life-changing link go ahead, even if its Chinese funding looks suspicious.
The project’s developer, Finest Bay Area Development Oy, was co-founded by Peter “Mighty Eagle” Vesterbacka, one of the principal creators of the Angry Birds computer game. Last month, it announced that it had arranged the funding for the 103-kilometer tunnel from Touchstone Capital Partners, a financial firm that invests the resources of state-owned Chinese enterprises, to the tune of $17 billion. The money is to go to three Chinese companies that have signed on to design and build the tunnel as part of their country’s Belt and Road Initiative. That’s what bothers the Estonian government: The Chinese initiative is unpopular with the European Union, and Estonia, ever the good European, wants to make sure it’s not going to get in trouble.
The biggest current Belt and Road project in Europe is a high-speed railroad link between Budapest and Belgrade. The EU has watched the project jealously. Its investigation of whether Hungary has followed its competition and anti-corruption rules when awarding contracts for the railroad modernization has held up the construction. Behind the misgivings is a geostrategic concern that China isn’t just seeking more convenient transport connections for its exports and imports but building up influence in EU member states, threatening the bloc’s unity and shared values.
I’d argue, though, that there’s no specific mechanism through which China could subvert Estonia or Finland if it’s allowed to build the tunnel, and that the project can only do the EU good – also in the geopolitical sense. At the same time, relying on EU participation in the project, as a 2018 feasibility study proposed, could lead to endless delays. It’s far from certain that Estonia and Finland would even be able to secure sufficient funding for a project they’ve been discussing for two decades.
The study said the project wouldn’t be feasible without a 40% EU grant to cover the costs, and even then, Estonia and Finland would need to subsidize it. At this level of government participation, long delays are inevitable.
A similar project to build an 18-kilometer undersea tunnel between the Danish island of Lolland and the German island of Fehmarn in 2010 still hasn’t gotten off the ground. It qualified as an EU priority project, received funding from the bloc for 16% of total costs and finally obtained approval from the German government and the Danish parliament this year. But it’s still stuck in the pre-construction stage because of a successful complaint by a shipper, Scandlines, whose ferry business would be affected by the link. Late last year, the EU’s General Court ruled that Danish state aid to the project was illegal, and in June, the European Commission followed up on the ruling by launching an investigation into the project’s funding. For that and other reasons, it’s almost certain it won’t be finished by the announced deadline of 2028.
This article first appeared on www.bloomberg.com
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2019 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.