Public Transport Victoria forum hears call for more Maryborough train services
State Government Commits to Developing Rail Infrastructure for Victoria
Horsham residents to be quizzed about future use of dormant rail corridor land
No choppers here: Malcolm Turnbull takes the train to Geelong
Opposition Leader Matthew Guy backs Melbourne Airport rail link
Jail time for train threats to Vline Staff
Premier Daniel Andrews hears efforts to address Central Goldfields disadvantage, push for more Maryborough trains
The Inland Rail Link Melbourne to Brisbane a Similar Case as the RAA's Bendigo - Geelong Rail Link
North-West Rail Alliance urges more council support amid push for return of Mildura passenger rail
Grampians Rail Trail: Shire calls for community to step up and manage facility
Metro Trains Melbourne (MTM) want roster changes, that much is clear. Initially, MTM approached the unions and members citing that “ONSRR made us do it”.
Apparently, there was a fatigue issue somewhere in the darkest dangerous depths of the 27 odd rosters that are currently utilised throughout the network which was identified in a 2016 report.
They hastily engaged a fatigue specialist and got to work designing rosters that set about attempting to resolve this issue.
MTM formed a central rostering committee in the hope of establishing a common roster across all depots, where I presume the thought process was, the best way to get a new roster through is to get 40 angry members in a room and spend upward of 16hrs explaining to them that changing rosters was in their best interests. That losing 10 to 15k a year (approx) on MTMs proposed roster would be best for their shakra’s and would ultimately put MTM in a place where it could Feng Shui the crap out of their depots leading to a happier, healthier and cheerful workforce.
Apparently the response that management received, wasn’t the one they were expecting, funnily enough, the before mentioned members didn’t take kindly to a proposed pay cut, which was exacerbated by the fact that MTM couldn’t produce any real evidence that there was, in fact, a fatigue issue at all. What was brought to light, however, was that, rather than ONSRR taking issues with rosters directly, they had issues with the way MTM managed its fatigue and subsequent fatigue management plan. Some may say that the disparity of “facts” is relatively suspicious.
Suddenly other reasons for roster changes were presented by MTM, such as fleet cascade, training, Comeng retirement, timetable changes, etc etc. All of which sound seemingly plausible at least at first glance. Perhaps even more so, if MTM didn’t identify that ripping the guts out of schedule D and allowing the company to change rosters with 28 days’ notice was front and centre of their Log of Claims during the concurrent EBA negotiations.
So, where are we now?
Well, thankfully management have concluded that perhaps taking rosters to local depots and establishing local rostering committees is a good way forward. Rosters are after all local issues, changes have different effects on different members, some are financial, but many are lifestyle based, people have different responsibilities, family arrangements, commitments and consequentially availability. All these factors need to be taken into consideration and recognised and dealt with as part of this process. The union cannot stop MTM proposing a roster change, we have schedule D to deal with that, but we will do our utmost to protect our members interests during this process.
If you have any questions regarding your roster, feel free to give me a call on 0457 006 739.
This article first appeared on www.rtbuvic.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2019 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.