Tunnel experts warn Premier Daniel Andrews on East West Link
East West Link battle justifies need for non-partisan body on infrastructure
Melbourne Airport Drive extension opened
Atlas 5 sets sail to orbit
Melbourne's first double-decker bus ready to rumble when Regional Rail Link opens
$500m Abrams tanks in the wars
Woman trapped under bus in Sydney's CBD dies
We're still going to miss the bus
Linking Melbourne Authority to be kept despite having no roads to build
Burgers in a rooftop train carriage? Easey's burger joint to open in Collingwood
Owners of ships, railcars and trucks face increased risk from environmental regulations, credit rating agency Moody’s said. The value of $265 billion in debt owed by transportation companies may be in for a bumpy ride in the near-term due to the costs of meeting those new rules. But Moody’s said the transition should be manageable.
Moody’s added shipping, surface transportation and automotive to the six industries facing “elevated” risk due to new laws being put in place to limit emissions. Moody’s said the assessment “reflects exposure to environmental risks that could be material to credit quality over the next three to five years.”
Coal mining and unregulated utilities are in the highest level of risk over the next one to three years, Moody’s said.
The assessment comes as financiers look more closely at the environmental roadmap of their borrowers than ever. In June, 11 banks that are major lenders to the shipping industry pledged they would consider carbon dioxide emissions when making decisions on lending against vessels.
Shipping companies are looking to take up the challenge of meeting the new rules. Maersk (Nasdaq OMX: MAER) is now marketing a low-carbon sailing to customers.
Closer to home, major U.S. ports are requiring trucking companies to buy newer model trucks in order to service marine terminals.
Despite concerns about vessels and trucks becoming stranded assets, Moody’s does see the hurdle to a greener future as manageable in many cases.
The shipping industry faces one of the biggest near-term challenges with the International Maritime Organization’s rule that sulfur emissions must be capped 0.5 percent, down from the current 3.5 percent standard beginning on January 1, 2020.
Shipping companies face higher costs throughout the IMO 2020 hump, whether due to buying more expensive low-sulfur fuel or spending on sulfur scrubbing devices to reduce output.
Moody’s notes that neither option is too palatable as low-sulfur fuel costs about $20 per barrel, or 48 cents per gallon, in the wholesale market. Sulfur scrubbers, meanwhile, cost between $2 million and $10 million and require a ship to be out of service for multiple days.
But Moody’s noted that shipping has already been able to meet even tougher sulfur emission standards of 0.5 percent or lower in heavily trafficked coastal areas of North America, Europe and now China. Shippers in those major markets are already paying the higher fuel bills. As a result, Moody’s expects that “the higher costs resulting from the regulations will ultimately be passed on to customers, thereby lessening the effect on shipping companies.”
For the rail industry, the biggest threat is not the fuel use, but in cargo. Rail’s coal volumes continue to decline as low natural gas prices encourage power plants to switch and states seek to limit carbon dioxide emissions. But Moody’s notes that railroads have been able to tap other freight, particularly intermodal, to offset less coal.
The risk in trucking is split between manufacturers and their carrier customers. But Moody’s said U.S. truck engine manufacturers have been dealing with stricter standards on diesel emissions for over 40 years, hence “future emission requirements will not require the significant step-up in costs that have accompanied past changes in regulations.”
Carriers, though, face an increasingly complex calculus about the next truck they buy. The availability of battery-electric trucks will allow carriers to meet lower emission thresholds, but more efficient diesel engines will also be able to close that gap. As a result, Moody’s said the uptake of battery-electric trucks “will be relatively slow and will primarily depend on the all-in cost” of those vehicles relative to diesel trucks.
This article first appeared on s29755.pcdn.co
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2020 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.