KAP drafting legislation to try to alter Inland Rail route
Rose City voice to join rail project
CP Rail investigating after train derails between Golden and Revelstoke
Inland rail builders promise community consultation
Price tag for $10b Melbourne to Brisbane rail project could be higher
Moree Plains Shire Council receives $300,000 in funding for freight and infrastructure funding
New business park part of Moree's plan for big rail role
Inland rail delayed by Canberra's indecision
Albury-Wodonga stop confirmed for inland rail project
Need to solve inland rail's 'missing link' says Port of Brisbane
AN alternative Inland Rail route, which does not require suburban southside houses to be knocked down, is being considered by the federal government.
The proposed new route, which terminates near Toowoomba’s international airport, would use trucks for the final leg of the journey to bring freight into Brisbane.
It makes use of the state government’s $1.6 billion Toowoomba Second Range Crossing, which opened to traffic this week.
It would mean all coal trains and export containers would be sent to Gladstone and would rule out the need for multibillion-dollar tunnels between Gowrie and Kagaru.
The proposal was outlined but dismissed in a pre-feasibility study conducted by Deloitte Access Economics for the Port of Brisbane and published on the weekend.
The report said building the track to Gladstone would cost at least $3 billion and Brisbane would remain the favoured destination for both importers and exporters.
It said a direct track to Brisbane was necessary for Queensland to keep pace with its growing population and to keep trucks off the roads and emissions down.
“Furthermore, there would be other additional costs such as … road or rail haulage of products back to Brisbane from Gladstone … it does not help solve Brisbane issues including growing road congestion.”
The report’s findings were backed up by the track’s developer, the Australian Rail Track Corporation.
But Brisbane southside residents, whose houses would be affected by the current Inland Rail route through Hillcrest, Forestdale and Acacia Ridge, have backed the Gladstone proposal as has Queensland Senator and National Party member Matt Canavan.
This article first appeared on www.couriermail.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2020 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.