Council needs to fast-track rail before gridlock
First train ride re-enacted for Queensland Rail's 150th birthday
Nambour a better option: Woombye anti-rail stabling group
South west Queensland pushes for more rail services for cattle
Tilt Trains set for a major overhaul
Ipswich celebrates heritage at Rail Museum on Open Day
Two rail lines earmarked for northern Australia
The $55.8 million dual gauge rail line from Acacia Ridge to Bromelton remains unfinished
Police investigate if fallen powerlines on Gold Coast train line work of vandals
Sourcing critical railway upgrade funding needs cool heads and smart solutions
AN independent audit of the handling of the Moreton Bay Rail Link’s signalling system will report back to Transport Minister Striling Hinchliffe by the end of July.
The government today released the terms of reference for the independent review of the signalling system after revealing this week that the link’s opening had been delayed indefinitely after Queensland Rail deemed the signalling system unsafe.
Mr Hinchliffe said the review would consider governance and contractual processes relating to the signalling system and the performance and integration of the systems during design and construction.
“On Monday I announced MBRL would not be operational mid-year as previously stated because Queensland Rail testing had determined the signalling system currently installed does not meet the operational and safety standards found across the rest of the network,” Mr Hinchliffe said.
“This review will determine what went wrong and how the signalling system was selected.
“This review will run separately to the work being undertaken by Queensland Rail into the requirements of the signalling systems in order for Moreton Bay Rail Link to open.”
The Department of Transport and Main Roads, Queensland Rail and other parties will be compelled to provide relevant documents to the audit as requested, “subject to commercial or cabinet confidentiality”.
The audit will look at:
Any signalling system related issues, risks and/or opportunities arising from the decision in 2012 to bring the project under the auspices of the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR);
A review of the signalling system elements of the tendering and contract process;
Whether the role assigned to Queensland Rail through contractual and/or governance documents and processes provided for appropriate involvement of the rail operator in the assurance processes relating to signalling; and
Contract milestone payments relating to signalling, and gainshare payments, and the grounds upon which any payments have been made.
Performance and integration of signalling systems during design and construction, including:
The nature of assurance activities by the project team, Queensland Rail, or other parties to monitor, test, and review signalling systems and signalling system interface/integration;
The nature of interface/integration issues experienced between multiple signalling systems on the one network; and
The adequacy of assurance activities, and lessons for future rail contract selection and oversight;
The processes by which concerns raised by Queensland Rail or other parties regarding the signalling systems or signalling system integration were managed; and
The assurance program being implemented by Queensland Rail in order to have the project commissioned
The review would also consider the Queensland Audit Office’s report, 2015-16 Transport Infrastructure Projects, Mr Hinchliffe said
This article first appeared on www.couriermail.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2018 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.