Public Transport Victoria forum hears call for more Maryborough train services
State Government Commits to Developing Rail Infrastructure for Victoria
Horsham residents to be quizzed about future use of dormant rail corridor land
No choppers here: Malcolm Turnbull takes the train to Geelong
Opposition Leader Matthew Guy backs Melbourne Airport rail link
Jail time for train threats to Vline Staff
Premier Daniel Andrews hears efforts to address Central Goldfields disadvantage, push for more Maryborough trains
The Inland Rail Link Melbourne to Brisbane a Similar Case as the RAA's Bendigo - Geelong Rail Link
North-West Rail Alliance urges more council support amid push for return of Mildura passenger rail
Grampians Rail Trail: Shire calls for community to step up and manage facility
Parts of the planned $1.6 billion sky rail between Caulfield and Dandenong could be demolished within 12 years of being built, and new linear parks and paths beneath the line built over, to allow a new structure with two extra rail tracks.
Two extra tracks for express trains, V/Line and freight, are part of longer-term plans for the Cranbourne-Pakenham rail corridor, and could see parts of the sky rail torn down under a secret deal between government authorities.
The third and fourth tracks have been omitted from the scope of the Andrews government's sky rail project: the removal of nine of Melbourne's most congested level crossings and the rebuilding of five railway stations by 2018, just in time for the next state election.
The project will boost capacity on the line by 42 per cent, the government says.
But some time beyond 2018, a future Victorian government will face a painful choice of either building a new rail viaduct down the middle of the two raised viaducts the government is to begin building this year, or potentially acquiring dozens of properties between Carnegie and Hughesdale.
The Level Crossing Removal Authority, which is in charge of the project, insists the sky rail design unveiled last month includes provision for the future construction of a third and fourth track.
But it has refused to reveal basic details of where those tracks will go.
"The third and fourth track is not part of the level crossing removal project," authority chief executive Kevin Devlin said.
"The alignment of these tracks will be determined in the future, as part of a separate project."
However, The Age has learned of planning details for the extra tracks.
Public Transport Victoria estimates the extra tracks will be needed from 2030, based on forecast passenger demand for Melbourne's busiest and most overcrowded rail line.
About 37,000 passengers are expected to travel on the Cranbourne-Pakenham line in the two-hour morning peak by 2030, more than double current levels and thousands more than on any other line in Melbourne.
In planning for this huge growth, PTV and the Level Crossing Removal Authority struck a confidential agreement last year on what can be built now on land where the third and fourth tracks will eventually go.
Under this agreement, sky rail infrastructure that could be demolished or built over for the extra track pair includes shared walking and cycling paths, station platforms, station car parks, lifts, ramps, buildings and minor utility services.
The Level Crossing Removal Authority agreed to this, on the condition that it did not add to the $1.6 billion cost of the current project.
The rail corridor is just 20 metres wide at its narrowest point between Grange Road in Carnegie and Poath Road in Murrumbeena, making it difficult to build four tracks without acquiring residential property along the line.
Edward Meysztowicz and his family own a house in Murrumbeena that backs onto the northern side of the line.
In meetings with the Level Crossing Removal Authority, Mr Meysztowicz obtained the dimensions of the planned sky rail structure, and its proximity to his home.
The authority confirmed the viaduct will be 10.6 metres above ground level and 4.3 metres away from his back fence where it runs behind his property. He used those dimensions to commission an illustration of the sky rail from his own backyard.
Mr Meysztowicz runs a business in industrial Dandenong South and insists he supports new infrastructure, even on the rail line behind his home.
But he argues the government is thrusting a cheaper, inferior option on the public, and should spend what it takes to build all four tracks below ground level now.
"Do it once but do it properly," he said.
Only when the third and fourth tracks are built will the true scale of sky rail be revealed, he argued - a rail viaduct that will dominate and transform the suburban environment far beyond what is depicted in the authority's promotional material.
Mr Meysztowicz also commissioned speculative images of his neighbourhood with a third and fourth track.
"The sheer bulk of sky rail in the landscape demands cloaking with multi-storey development," Mr Meysztowicz said.
"This is inter-generational infrastructure our children will be grappling with."
Jeremy Reynolds, an urban planner who played important roles in Melbourne's development from the 1970s until his retirement in 2014, agrees that the Andrews government has failed to be up-front with the community about the fact that sky rail is "just part one" of long-term plans for the Cranbourne-Pakenham rail line.
"Given the scale of patronage growth, surely the government should be openly planning for four tracks between Caulfield and Dandenong now," Mr Reynolds said.
This article first appeared on www.theage.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2018 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.