KAP drafting legislation to try to alter Inland Rail route
Rose City voice to join rail project
CP Rail investigating after train derails between Golden and Revelstoke
Inland rail builders promise community consultation
Price tag for $10b Melbourne to Brisbane rail project could be higher
Moree Plains Shire Council receives $300,000 in funding for freight and infrastructure funding
New business park part of Moree's plan for big rail role
Inland rail delayed by Canberra's indecision
Albury-Wodonga stop confirmed for inland rail project
Need to solve inland rail's 'missing link' says Port of Brisbane
South-east Queensland residents angered by a perceived lack of information and consultation about the planned route of the $9.3 billion Inland Rail will have a chance to speak to a Senate inquiry into the project this week.
The Melbourne-Brisbane inland freight rail route will slice through south-east Queensland floodplains near Toowoomba and take up to 45 trains a day through Logan suburbs before ending at Acacia Ridge in Brisbane's south.
The Melbourne to Brisbane Inland Rail project will enable freight to be moved between the capital cities within 24 hours.
In September last year management of the project by the Australian Rail Track Corporation was referred to the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee for inquiry, with two hearings scheduled in Millmerran and Brisbane next week.
An open microphone session is set for Millmerran on the afternoon of January 29.
In November it emerged at Senate Estimates that consultants were paid $200,000 to help develop an empathetic approach to residents affected by the route between Melbourne and Brisbane.
Late last year the inquiry received submissions from south-east Queensland councils, organisations and individual residents complaining there was no consultation about the planned route before it was announced.
Port of Brisbane chief executive Roy Cummins submitted that while he supported the project in principle, ending the route at Acacia Ridge, more than 30 kilometres from the port, would force more heavy trucks onto the roads.
Mr Cummins said the Port also had concerns about the "considerable time advantage held by other states", as work on the project had begun in NSW but not in Queensland.
"The obvious complexity of the Queensland section, as well as the lack of agreement (until recently) between the state and federal governments, has meant Queensland will be years behind," he wrote.
Under a joint federal and state funding agreement in November, it was agreed that a business case would be developed to link the rail line to the Port of Brisbane.
This article first appeared on www.brisbanetimes.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2020 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.