... Morrison's major thought is that he must look tough at any cost. His mate Dutton is just as bad.
Actually, Cottees marketed a range of dessert toppings named after those two - "Rich and Thick."
At least we're not willing to be silenced by Chinese aggression. Glad that ScoMo isn't falling over backwards to appease the CCP thugs.If he is re-elected, and I hope he isn’t. That would make the first PM since Howard to serve a full term.
Carnot
Scroto is falling over backwards to be re elected
He's not fit to pe prime minister
Unfortunately, we have to live with the fact that Morrison's major thought is that he must look tough at any cost. His mate Dutton is just as bad.Check out Morrison’s pecuniary interest register, doesn’t appear that rich on paper.
Actually, Cottees marketed a range of dessert toppings named after those two - "Rich and Thick."
Unfortunately, we have to live with the fact that Morrison's major thought is that he must look tough at any cost. His mate Dutton is just as bad.ScoMo and Dutton et al are NOT being belligerent - all they're doing is telling China the truth and (of course) there's nothing that communists hate more than truth-telling so its off to the sin bin we go.
Actually, Cottees marketed a range of dessert toppings named after those two - "Rich and Thick."
Oh yeah, that's right.At least we're not willing to be silenced by Chinese aggression. Glad that ScoMo isn't falling over backwards to appease the CCP thugs.If he is re-elected, and I hope he isn’t. That would make the first PM since Howard to serve a full term.
Carnot
Scroto is falling over backwards to be re elected
He's not fit to pe prime minister
At least we're not willing to be silenced by Chinese aggression. Glad that ScoMo isn't falling over backwards to appease the CCP thugs.Oops, I was agreeing with the part that Carnot wrote.
Carnot
Scroto is falling over backwards to be re elected
He's not fit to pe prime minister
At least we're not willing to be silenced by Chinese aggression. Glad that ScoMo isn't falling over backwards to appease the CCP thugs.All these appeasers here have no concept of how you deal with thugs - neither does the Labor Party after that statement from Penny Wong the other day that we should just shut the hell up to appease a murderous dictatorship. Pathetic, p*ss weak really, I would have expected better from her.
I've been suitably outraged for years now, that both sides of politics have allowed wineries farms and a multitude of business to enter foreign handsIt isn't 'standing up to them' - all we are doing is insisting that the CCP should be subjected to the same laws and rules as everyone else is in Australia. And they don't like it - they want to be 'special' and beyond reproach - they especially do not want any adverse media coverage of their activities.
But tell me that standing up to a bully like china will achieve what exactly?
Not to mention the lack of reciprocity - Foreign investment in China and Chinese businesses is very tightly controlled. Last I checked most businesses investing in China had to have a 50% Chinese investment partner (many of who then "borrow" IP from the foreign investors)I've been suitably outraged for years now, that both sides of politics have allowed wineries farms and a multitude of business to enter foreign handsIt isn't 'standing up to them' - all we are doing is insisting that the CCP should be subjected to the same laws and rules as everyone else is in Australia. And they don't like it - they want to be 'special' and beyond reproach - they especially do not want any adverse media coverage of their activities.
But tell me that standing up to a bully like china will achieve what exactly?
If we cave and give them what they want what do you think will happen to rule of law and democratic processes if we allow them to be a 'special case'?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/07/australias-anti-war-movement-is-depleted-who-will-stop-the-march-to-the-drums-of-warWho in the western world is actively calling for war with China?
I'm totally shocked that unicorns are mythical
Nice synopsis - Australia gets no special favors from China and yet they want to be made exempt from free media and the rule of law in Australia because they're China. The fact that some people in the Labor Party (and indeed the LNP) are considering giving them what they want is ludicrous. The core tenets of liberal democracy are both freedom of the press and equality before the law. The Chinese Communist Party effectively want the abolition of both for them to 'normalise' the trade relationship.Not to mention the lack of reciprocity - Foreign investment in China and Chinese businesses is very tightly controlled. Last I checked most businesses investing in China had to have a 50% Chinese investment partner (many of who then "borrow" IP from the foreign investors)I've been suitably outraged for years now, that both sides of politics have allowed wineries farms and a multitude of business to enter foreign handsIt isn't 'standing up to them' - all we are doing is insisting that the CCP should be subjected to the same laws and rules as everyone else is in Australia. And they don't like it - they want to be 'special' and beyond reproach - they especially do not want any adverse media coverage of their activities.
But tell me that standing up to a bully like china will achieve what exactly?
If we cave and give them what they want what do you think will happen to rule of law and democratic processes if we allow them to be a 'special case'?
And try buying property in China as a foreigner and see how you go!!! All sorts of hoops and regulations to navigate if indeed you are allowed to do it.
Yet they think that they should be subject to a completely different (and more favourable) set of rules in Australia
Their behaviour is no different to that of Captains of Industry who demand favourable treatment from banks, municipal authorities and whatnot, dangling the promise of economic gain in return for favourable treatment. I imagine they don't so much believe that they should get this favourable treatment as they can get it.So following that logic, because a few really wealthy people can get away with stuff why bother stopping a whole nation from doing it to us.