Toronto completes Union Station Revitalisation Project
Canadian Pacific publishes comprehensive Climate Strategy
CP Publishes Climate Strategy
TransLink to begin upgrade work on SkyBridge in Canada
Toronto: USRP Complete, USEP Under Way
Canadian Pacific sees record Q2 revenue
Transit Briefs: Edmonton Capital Line South LRT; DART
CP: ‘Extremely Well Positioned’ for Second-Half ’21
CP to KCS Shareholders: Read the Blue Card and Vote Red (“Stop”)
CP: Market alliances can serve as means to convert truck traffic
The total is now more than 330, according CP, which noted that together, more than 1,050 letters have been “filed in support of CP’s proposed combination with KCS or in opposition to the CN proposal.”
To recap: On May 21, KCS terminated its merger agreement with CP and entered into a definitive merger agreement with CN. This involved paying CP a breakup fee of $700 million, reimbursed by CN.
CN and KCS submitted to STB on May 26 a renewed motion for voting trust approval, which includes a commitment to divest a 70-mile line overlap in Louisiana. On June 14, per the STB’s request, they filed additional financial documents that will help the agency decide whether or not to approve their voting trust agreement. STB’s official public comment period on that agreement is open until June 28.
CP on June 21 reported that “[s]hippers that could lose shipping options in the New Orleans to Baton Rouge [La.] corridor have also submitted letters in opposition to CN’s voting trust, including Pinnacle Polymers, which notes: ‘… we are closely monitoring this issue and ardently believe that the use of a trust for any merger under the 2001 Major Merger Rules would not be in our interest, much less the public interest.’”
What is the next step for CP? The Class I railroad said it “plans to file comments no later than June 28, explaining why the public interest costs of CN’s proposed voting trust outweigh the non-existent benefits.” It added that “STB has already approved CP’s use of a voting trust and affirmed KCS’ waiver from the new rail merger rules it adopted in 2001 because a CP-KCS combination is truly end-to-end, pro-competitive, and the only viable Class I combination.”
CP said it continues to pursue the application process to acquire KCS so the “CP-KCS combination can be reviewed by the STB and implemented without undue delay, in the event KCS’ agreement with CN is terminated or CN is otherwise unable to acquire control of KCS.”
In related developments, KCS recently asked the STB to reject CP’s petition for expedited declaratory relief, which KCS claims would assist CP in preparing a “hostile” control application.
In other news, CN and KCS on June 17 announced receiving a total of 1,500-plus letters in support of their proposed merger, including those from Rep. Jerry Carl (R-Ala.), the Jerseyville (Ill.) Economic Development Council, and the Port of Gulfport (Miss.).
This article first appeared on www.railwayage.com
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.