Production of next-generation Acela Express fleet underway
Stadler unveils TEX Rail Flirt DMU
Siemens invests in remote monitoring specialist Wi-Tronix
DB consortium selected for California high speed rail
Judge puts the skids on state’s proposed rail trail
Amtrak's CEO shares his vision for rail's future
Flight Rail: a new type of train?
America’s short lines play the long game
New York rail operator bolsters security after London bombing
Citing competition concerns, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is asking the Surface Transportation Board (STB) not to approve a request by Canadian railway CN (NYSE: CNI) to form a voting trust. The voting trust would be used to acquire Kansas City Southern (NYSE: KSU).
CN is seeking to establish a voting trust as a way to protect Kansas City Southern (KCS) from being taken over as STB reviews CN’s request to merge with KCS. The board had approved a similar request by CN rival Canadian Pacific (NYSE: CP). CP is also seeking to acquire KCS.
While the DOJ said it hasn’t taken a position on either proposed merger, the agency takes an interest in the matter because the attorney general has a statutory right to intervene in Class I merger proceedings.
“The board should not permit the proposed CN voting trust because CN’s proposed acquisition of KCS appears to pose greater risks to competition than the risks posed by a CP-KCS merger,” said a Friday letter from Acting Attorney General Richard A. Powers, who represents the DOJ’s antitrust division. “Thus, even though the terms of CN’s proposed voting trust are similar to the terms of CP’s proposed voting trust, the board has good reason to hold CN’s proposed voting trust to a higher bar.”
Although the DOJ was also wary of CP’s request to establish a voting trust to acquire KCS, the rules that guide STB on whether to approve CN’s request to establish a voting trust should be applied “with greater force” because of “additional potential competitive concerns,” Powers said, noting that a voting trust implies a unity in ownership, which means CN and KCS would be less inclined to compete.
CN’s and KCS’ lines also parallel for certain routes, such as between New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Even though those routes don’t have the same origin-destination pairs, CN’s management would not be compelled to offer competitive options for shippers because CN is competing against a railroad it is seeking to acquire, Powers said.
“CN managers would have diminished incentives to compete aggressively against KCS in areas served by both railroads because winning business away from KCS would now hurt CN’s shareholders and vice versa. These specific competitive concerns presented by CN’s proposed transaction magnify the general risks associated with voting trusts described in the department’s prior filing,” Powers said.
CP said Friday it concurs with the DOJ’s assessment of CN’s proposal. Despite KCS’ announcement late Thursday that it views CN’s merger proposal as the superior offer, CP “remains confident” that its merger bid is the viable option going forward, as it has already [been] validated by two favorable rulings: STB’s approval for CP’s use of a voting trust and the board’s affirmation that KCS be waived from complying with post-2001 merger rules.
CP said Monday that more than 130 stakeholders have filed letters before STB in support of a CP-KCS merger, putting the total at more than 680 letters.
This article first appeared on s29755.pcdn.co
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.