KAP drafting legislation to try to alter Inland Rail route
Rose City voice to join rail project
CP Rail investigating after train derails between Golden and Revelstoke
Inland rail builders promise community consultation
Price tag for $10b Melbourne to Brisbane rail project could be higher
Moree Plains Shire Council receives $300,000 in funding for freight and infrastructure funding
New business park part of Moree's plan for big rail role
Inland rail delayed by Canberra's indecision
Albury-Wodonga stop confirmed for inland rail project
Need to solve inland rail's 'missing link' says Port of Brisbane
ENGINEERING design and consultancy company Arcadis is urging the Australian federal government to ensure that the design of the Inland Rail project to link Melbourne with Brisbane can accommodate hydrogen-powered trains, which it says have the potential save 763,000 tonnes of CO2 a year.
The $A 14.8bn ($US 10.7bn) Inland Rail freight project combines 1200km of upgrades with 500km of new railway, and is expected to start full operations in 2028.
Arcadis has undertaken a study with British clean energy company Smart Ports, which has been exploring the potential for decarbonising Australia’s rail infrastructure by deploying the ammonia to hydrogen cracking technology it has developed.
The scalable and modular ammonia to hydrogen refuelling terminals (SMAHRT) use hydrogen converted to liquid ammonia, which is then transported to the point of use where it is reconverted to fuel-grade hydrogen using portable, containerised cracking units.
This process avoids the difficulties of transporting hydrogen as either a compressed gas or in liquid form at extremely low temperatures.
The study found that if this cracking technology were used on Inland Rail, a single freight movement from Melbourne to Brisbane would be cheaper using hydrogen than diesel from 2024.
As a diesel-fuelled movement would generate 87,100kg of CO2, this would translate to a potential saving of 763,000 tonnes of CO2 per year, based on projections that Inland Rail would be used by an average of 12 freight movements each way per day at the start of operations.
“It will be up to rail operators to select their fuel source but, inevitably, the pressure will be on them to switch to clean fuels,” says Mr Luke Keys, clients director, resilience, at Arcadis. “The design of the rail link must therefore allow for ammonia and hydrogen fuel to be easily stored and accessed along the route.”
“The time to do that is now, as fuel transfer and storage requirements are built into the initial design and construction stage of the project. It will be much more expensive to retrofit fuel infrastructure to accommodate future fuels once the project is up and running,” Keys says.
This article first appeared on www.railjournal.com
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2022 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.
Stats for nerds
Gen time: 1.3048s | RAM: 6.66kb