Government changes plan on rail line (Prevents any railed vehicle from using rail line)
Sydney suburban fleet modernisation contract awarded
Opal takeover: Pensioner Excursion and TravelTen tickets cut from next year
Rail corridor worth up to $3.8m, depending on development constraints
Sydney Rail Workers Sick And Tired Of Violent Commuters
Sydney grandfather leaps into path of oncoming freight train after baby girl in stroller falls on tracks
Labor hopeful Jodi McKay backs government on rail plan
What Sydney needs to transport us to the future
South West Rail Link trains drivers warned to slow down
Sydney Trains boss critical of $344m upgrade of Cronulla to Sutherland railway line
A customer service attendant employed by Sydney Trains since 2000, travelled on an NSW TrainLink service between Albury and Sydney on 10 August 2019. Although receiving other train fares on the vacation free of charge, the worker paid the fare to Sydney in full.
After purchasing alcohol from the train buffet counter, the worker allegedly acted disrespectfully to three NSW Trains employees. The details of the worker’s behaviour were not disclosed in legal documents.
An investigation into the worker’s behaviour was commissioned by the Workplace Conduct and Investigations Unit of NSW Trains, which found that the worker had breached the Transport Code of Conduct and the Transport Prevention and Management of Bullying and Harassment Policy and Passes Booklet.
In a meeting on 26 November 2019, the worker was thereby dismissed from Sydney Trains.
The worker sought a review of the decision by the Transport for NSW Disciplinary Panel, who affirmed the dismissal. However, the FWC found that given Sydney Trains and NSW Trains are separate entities, the worker was not a colleague of NSW Trains employees.
Having paid the travel fare in full, the worker was not considered an ambassador for Sydney Trains at the time of the incident. Furthermore, given the worker was not performing employee duties, the Commission found no reputational damage to be caused. With this, the Commission was not satisfied that the worker’s behaviour constituted a valid reason for dismissal.
Sydney Trains rebutted by referring to the worker’s behaviour during the dismissal meeting as ‘aggressive and inappropriate’. However, given the poor timing of the meeting and lack of notice provided to the worker, this allegation was also dismissed by the Commission.
Ultimately, the Commission was satisfied that the worker was denied procedural fairness and the dismissal was harsh, unjust and unreasonable. The worker’s reinstatement with lost wages and superannuation adjustments was found to be an appropriate remedy.
This article first appeared on www.hcamag.com
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.