Beware the Treasurer’s double counting on transport funding
$10 billion on road and rail upgrades spearheads budget spending
Wheels turn on Rail Trail construction
'Visionary': The new plan for a Canberra to Eden railway line
Canberra's Light rail to Woden could blow out to almost $2 billion
Infrastructure Australia publishes Sustainability Principles
Master Builders CEO says delaying light rail will cost much-needed local jobs
Locally grown: The in-house, Australian R&D behind every Speno grinder
Fare hike waived in ACT as light rail frequency increased
ACT government to fund studies on light rail extensions
In February, before the COVID-19 crisis took hold, Infrastructure Australia added a Sydney-Canberra rail upgrade to its 2020 Infrastructure Priority List.
The corridor is in scope for the NSW government's fast rail strategy and is also listed for a later phase of the federal government's faster rail plan. This involves improved passenger rail services to regional centres in the orbits of Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, to help reduce pressures of congestion and housing unaffordability in those cities.
The Sydney-Canberra route is longer than others identified by the federal government, such as Brisbane-Gold Coast, Sydney-Newcastle and Melbourne-Geelong, and is also, uniquely, a "top 20" domestic air route. Particularly given current circumstances surrounding Australia's aviation sector, clarity about the economic and strategic case for following through with the Sydney-Canberra upgrade is important.
Here are four reasons we should back the project.
Firstly, bringing the Southern Highlands within around a one-hour commute time to Sydney would encourage new residential developments, offering more affordable homes with access to Sydney jobs. This would help relieve city pressures, while also growing a larger population base for locally based industry, similar to the strategy for other proposed upgrade corridors.
Secondly, a two-hour rail service between Sydney and Canberra, Australia's eighth-largest metropolitan area, could create new opportunities for "knowledge-intensive" businesses in both cities, helping them to organise their activities differently, achieve scale economies and become more productive.
A two-hour rail service would compare in overall journey time with air transport and would allow businesses to capture benefits of proximity that are out of reach due to air transport's high cost.
Fast rail would not replace air transport, as high-speed rail, with around a one-hour service time and at much higher cost, might largely do. But it could nevertheless grow business and tourism markets.
To illustrate, full-service airfares between Sydney and Melbourne are pitched similarly to those between Sydney and Canberra, despite the former route being three times longer than the latter. Moreover, low-cost airline (Jetstar) services between Sydney and Melbourne are priced at around a third of Sydney to Canberra full-service fares.
While low-cost carrier entry would be welcome, a key source of the cost differential is the "up then down" character of the Sydney-Canberra route, where, as with all air routes, costs such as check-in, baggage handling, take-off and landing are intrinsically airport-linked.
In contrast, fast rail, offering a maximum speed of up to 250km/h, would be a more natural fit for a high-capacity 300-kilometre route. Fares might be set a little above low-cost airline levels, as on the United Kingdom's rail network, or below this level, as in Sweden. Fast rail would not replace air transport, as high-speed rail, with around a one-hour service time and at much higher cost, might largely do. But it could nevertheless grow business and tourism markets. The improved and straightened track that fast rail requires might also provide opportunities for rail freight services.
Thirdly, a Sydney-Canberra fast rail service would help alleviate planning, housing and congestion pressures in Canberra, by making the Goulburn region commutable to Canberra on a larger basis. This would serve to underpin Canberra's future labour market and economic growth.
But is Canberra large enough for the security of its growth path to be considered nationally important, similarly to those of Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane? Taking into account Canberra's location and role within a broader region, the answer is yes.
This article first appeared on www.canberratimes.com.au
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.